The Unassailable Pillars: Exploring the Right to Freedom of Religion and Worship in Nigeria

Nigeria, a nation of vibrant diversity, pulsates with a rich tapestry of cultures, languages, and, profoundly, religions. From the ancient indigenous beliefs that predate colonial influences to the widespread adherence to Christianity and Islam, faith is an intrinsic part of the Nigerian identity. In such a multi-religious landscape, the right to freedom of religion and worship is not merely a legal provision; it is a vital artery that pumps the lifeblood of national cohesion, individual liberty, and social harmony. This blog post delves into the profound significance of this fundamental right in Nigeria, meticulously examining its constitutional bedrock, the intricate legal frameworks that support it, the formidable challenges it faces, and the promising prospects for its continued protection and promotion.

Historically, religious practices in Nigeria were deeply interwoven with community life, guided by unwritten customs and traditions. With the advent of Christianity and Islam, new dynamics emerged, leading to periods of both peaceful coexistence and, at times, tension. The colonial era introduced Western legal concepts, but it was with Nigeria’s independence and subsequent republican constitutions that the right to religious freedom found its explicit and robust articulation, evolving into the crucial constitutional provision we cherish today.

I. Constitutional Guarantees and Legal Frameworks

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) stands as the supreme law of the land, and its provisions are the primary bulwark safeguarding religious freedom. This fundamental right is not an afterthought but a cornerstone, meticulously enshrined to ensure that every citizen can freely exercise their faith without undue interference.

A. The 1999 Constitution (as amended) – The Cornerstone

The most significant provision is Section 38(1), which unequivocally states:

“Every person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in public or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance¹.”

Let’s break down the profound implications of this powerful statement:

“Freedom of thought, conscience and religion”: This encompasses both the internal and external dimensions of faith. Internally, it protects the right to hold any belief or no belief at all, to embrace or reject religious doctrines, and to form one’s own moral compass. Externally, it extends to the manifestation of these inner convictions.
“Including freedom to change his religion or belief”: This is a critical aspect, especially in a society where religious identities can be deeply entrenched. It guarantees an individual’s autonomy to convert to another faith or to abandon their current religion without fear of legal reprisal or social persecution. This particular aspect has, however, sometimes been a point of contention with interpretations of certain religious laws in parts of the country, highlighting a tension between constitutional provisions and specific religious jurisprudence.
“Freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in public or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion or belief”: This clause broadly covers how individuals express their faith.
- “Alone or in community with others”: It recognizes both individual devotion and collective worship, emphasizing the communal nature of many faiths. This includes the right to gather for religious services, form religious associations, and establish places of worship.
- “In public or in private”: This ensures that religious practice is not confined to personal spaces but can also be openly observed and expressed in public life, provided it does not infringe upon the rights of others or public order.
- “To manifest and propagate”: This signifies the right to express one’s religious beliefs through various means. “Manifest” refers to outward expressions like wearing religious attire (e.g., hijab, clerical robes), dietary practices, or observing religious holidays. “Propagate” refers to the right to share one’s faith with others, including evangelism or dawah, through peaceful and non-coercive means. This is crucial for the growth and continuity of religious communities.
- “In worship, teaching, practice and observance”: These terms cover the full spectrum of religious expression. “Worship” refers to rituals, prayers, and ceremonies. “Teaching” encompasses religious education and instruction. “Practice” includes adherence to religious laws and customs. “Observance” covers fasting, pilgrimage, and other acts of devotion.

Beyond Section 38(1), the 1999 Constitution reinforces Nigeria’s commitment to religious neutrality through Section 10:

“The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion.”

This provision firmly establishes Nigeria as a secular state, meaning that the government is prohibited from endorsing, favoring, or establishing any particular religion. It mandates government neutrality in religious matters, ensuring that the state does not discriminate against any religious group and treats all faiths equally under the law. This is particularly important in a country with significant populations of both Christians and Muslims, along with adherents of various indigenous belief systems. The interpretation and application of this section, particularly concerning the role of Sharia law in some northern states, remain subjects of ongoing debate and legal scrutiny.

Other constitutional provisions that intersect with and strengthen religious freedom include:

Section 42 (Right to non-discrimination): This section prohibits discrimination against any citizen based on, among other things, their religion. It ensures that individuals are not disadvantaged or denied opportunities due to their faith.
Section 39 (Freedom of expression): The right to freedom of expression is intricately linked to religious propagation and the dissemination of religious ideas. While it allows for the sharing of beliefs, it is not absolute and is subject to limitations, particularly concerning hate speech or incitement to violence.
Section 40 (Right to peaceful assembly and association): This guarantees the right of individuals to gather peacefully and form associations, which is crucial for religious communities to organize, worship collectively, and establish religious bodies.

B. International and Regional Instruments

Nigeria, as a member of the international community, is also bound by various international and regional human rights instruments that complement its domestic legal framework. These instruments reinforce the universal nature of religious freedom.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) – Article 18: The UDHR, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and obser²vance.” As a signatory, Nigeria is committed to upholding these principles.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) – Article 18: This treaty provides a more detailed elaboration of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, echoing the UDHR’s provisions and emphasizing the right to hold or adopt a religion or belief of one’s choice, and the freedom to manifest it. Nigeria’s ratification of the ICCPR strengthens its international obligations in this regard.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) – Article 8: Within the African context, the ACHPR guarantees “Freedom of conscience, the profession and free practice of religion shall be guaranteed. No one may, subject to law and order, be submitted to measures hindering the exercise of these freedoms.” This regional instrument further solidifies the commitment to religious freedom on the continent.

These international and regional instruments serve not only as guiding principles but also as benchmarks against which Nigeria’s domestic laws and practices can be assessed. They reinforce the principle of pacta sunt servanda, meaning that agreements must be kept, underscoring Nigeria’s commitment on the global stage to uphold religious freedom.

C. Subsidiary Legislation and Policies

While the Constitution provides the overarching framework, specific subsidiary legislation and government policies also play a role in regulating religious activities. These can include laws related to the registration of religious organizations, land use regulations for the construction of places of worship, or public order laws that may impact religious processions or gatherings. While intended to maintain order and accountability, such laws must always be applied in a manner that respects and does not unduly restrict fundamental religious freedoms.

II. Judicial Interpretation and Precedents

The Nigerian judiciary plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing constitutional provisions, including the right to freedom of religion and worship. Through landmark judgments, the courts have sought to clarify the scope and limitations of this right, often navigating complex cases that pit individual religious freedom against other societal interests.

A. Landmark Cases

Nigerian courts have consistently affirmed the supremacy of the Constitution in matters of religious freedom. While specific case names might vary in prominence, the jurisprudence has generally addressed issues such as:

Religious attire in public institutions: Cases involving the wearing of the hijab by Muslim students in public schools have been particularly contentious. While some lower courts initially restricted its use, higher courts, including the Court of Appeal and even the Supreme Court in some instances, have increasingly affirmed the right to wear the hijab as part of religious manifestation, provided it does not disrupt public order or safety. These cases often involve balancing the right to religious freedom against institutional policies or perceived secular principles.
Rights of religious organizations: Courts have adjudicated cases concerning the registration of religious bodies, their right to own property, and their ability to operate without undue government interference. The general trend is to uphold the autonomy of religious organizations within the bounds of the law.
Challenges to perceived state religious favoritism: Citizens have, at times, approached the courts to challenge government actions or policies that they believe favor one religion over others, thereby violating the secularity enshrined in Section 10 of the Constitution.
Freedom of worship in communal settings: Disputes arising from competing claims over public spaces for religious activities or noise pollution from places of worship have also found their way to the courts, requiring judges to balance the rights of one group to worship with the rights of others to peace and quiet.

Through these judgments, the judiciary has generally sought to uphold the broad scope of religious freedom while acknowledging the need for reasonable limitations to protect public order, safety, and the rights of others. The interpretations have emphasized the non-absolute nature of fundamental rights, paving the way for the application of general limitation clauses.

B. Balancing Act: Limitations and Derogations

It is crucial to understand that no fundamental right, including religious freedom, is absolute. The 1999 Constitution provides for general limitations on fundamental rights in Section 45(1), which states:

“Nothing in Sections 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 of this Constitution shall invalidate any law that is reasonably justifiable in a democratic society in the interest of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health; or for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons.”

This section provides the legal basis for the state to impose restrictions on religious practices when necessary to achieve legitimate governmental objectives. For example:

Public safety: Religious processions that block traffic or pose a risk to public safety might be subject to reasonable regulations regarding routes or timing.
Public order: Practices that incite violence or disrupt peace and order can be curtailed. This is particularly relevant in the context of hate speech masquerading as religious propagation.
Public morality or public health: While rare, certain religious practices deemed to be gravely harmful to public health or morality could be restricted.
Protecting the rights and freedom of other persons: This is a crucial balancing act. For instance, the right of a religious group to hold loud outdoor services might be limited if it infringes upon the right to peace and quiet of nearby residents. Similarly, religious practices that infringe on the rights of women, children, or minorities, even if justified by religious texts, could be subject to constitutional scrutiny.

The key legal principle guiding these limitations is that any restriction must be “reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.” This implies that the restriction must be necessary, proportionate to the aim it seeks to achieve, and the least restrictive means available. It must not be arbitrary or discriminatory, and the burden of proof lies with the state to demonstrate the justification for the limitation.

III. Challenges and Threats to Religious Freedom

Despite robust constitutional and legal safeguards, the right to freedom of religion and worship in Nigeria faces numerous challenges, some deeply rooted in historical grievances, socio-economic factors, and the actions of various actors. These challenges often lead to violations of the very rights the Constitution seeks to protect.

A. Religious Intolerance and Conflicts

Nigeria has unfortunately witnessed recurring episodes of inter-religious violence, particularly in the northern and central regions. Places like Jos, Kaduna, and parts of the Middle Belt have been flashpoints for sectarian clashes.

Historical context: These conflicts often have deep historical roots, sometimes fueled by colonial policies that exacerbated existing ethnic and religious divisions.
Causes:
- Ethno-religious sentiments: Religion often intertwines with ethnic identity, leading to situations where conflicts initially driven by land, resources, or political power take on a religious dimension.
- Political manipulation: Unscrupulous politicians sometimes exploit religious differences to mobilize support or to divert attention from governance failures, fanning the flames of discord.
- Socio-economic disparities: Perceived inequalities in wealth distribution, access to education, or employment opportunities can create resentment that is easily channeled along religious lines.
- Hate speech and incitement: The spread of inflammatory rhetoric, sermons, or social media content that demonizes other religious groups often precedes and fuels violence.
Impact: The consequences of religious intolerance are devastating: loss of lives, widespread displacement of communities, destruction of homes and places of worship, disruption of economic activities, and a profound erosion of trust among different religious groups.

B. Extremist Groups and Insurgency

Perhaps the most severe threat to religious freedom in Nigeria comes from violent extremist groups, notably Boko Haram and the Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP).

Ideology and objectives: These groups subscribe to a radical, extremist interpretation of Islam that rejects secular education and democratic governance. Their ultimate objective is often to establish a caliphate governed by their strict version of Sharia law.
Severe threat to religious freedom: They pose a direct and existential threat to the religious freedom of all Nigerians, including Muslims who do not subscribe to their ideology, and especially Christians and other religious minorities.
Targeting of religious minorities and places of worship: Churches, mosques (especially those that do not conform to their radical interpretations), and religious schools have been frequently targeted.
Forced conversions, abduction, and killings: These groups engage in systematic human rights abuses, including forced conversions, abduction of individuals (e.g., the Chibok girls), and summary executions of those who resist or are deemed infidels. This represents a profound denial of the right to choose and practice one’s faith.

C. State Actions and Policies (Perceived or Actual)

While the Constitution mandates neutrality, there have been instances where state actions or policies have been perceived to undermine religious freedom or show favoritism.

Religious discrimination in public service/employment: Allegations of bias in government appointments, promotions, or access to public services based on religious affiliation are not uncommon. This can lead to feelings of marginalization among certain religious groups.
Government interference in religious affairs: Instances of over-regulation of religious bodies, attempts to control internal religious doctrines, or restrictions on religious education have raised concerns about undue state interference in religious autonomy.
Enforcement of Sharia law in Northern States: The adoption and expansion of Sharia penal codes in some northern Nigerian states since the return to civilian rule in 1999 has been a contentious issue.
- Legal framework: Sharia law operates alongside common law in these states, primarily applying to Muslims in matters of personal status (marriage, divorce, inheritance) and, in some cases, criminal offenses.
- Compatibility debate: Critics argue that the criminal aspects of Sharia law, with penalties like amputation for theft or stoning for adultery, are incompatible with Nigeria’s secular constitution and international human rights standards, particularly when applied to non-Muslims or when their application is perceived as discriminatory.
- Allegations of human rights abuses: Cases of alleged blasphemy leading to mob justice or severe punishments, as well as the unequal application of Sharia law, have sparked national and international condemnation, raising serious questions about the protection of religious freedom for all citizens in these regions.
Land allocation and building permits for places of worship: Challenges faced by certain religious groups in obtaining land or permits to build places of worship, sometimes due to bureaucratic hurdles or alleged discrimination, also present obstacles to the free exercise of religion.

D. Socio-Cultural Factors

Beyond state and extremist actions, certain societal attitudes and practices also contribute to limitations on religious freedom.

Fanaticism and dogmatism within religious groups: Rigid interpretations of religious texts that promote exclusivity or intolerance towards other faiths can foster an environment where religious freedom is not truly respected.
Pressure from families or communities: Individuals, particularly converts, may face severe social ostracism, threats, or violence from their families or communities for changing their religion, even if the Constitution guarantees this right.
Misinterpretations of religious texts: Selective or erroneous interpretations of religious scriptures can be used to justify discrimination, violence, or the suppression of dissenting voices within or outside a faith.
Lack of interfaith dialogue and understanding: Limited opportunities for meaningful engagement between different religious communities can perpetuate stereotypes, distrust, and ignorance about each other’s beliefs and practices.

IV. Promoting and Safeguarding Religious Freedom

Addressing the multifaceted challenges to religious freedom in Nigeria requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders. It necessitates a holistic approach that combines legal enforcement, political will, civil society engagement, and individual commitment to tolerance and understanding.

A. Role of Government and Institutions

The primary responsibility for upholding religious freedom rests with the Nigerian government and its institutions.

Strict adherence to constitutional provisions: The government must unequivocally uphold the principles of secularism (Section 10) and religious neutrality, ensuring that no religion is favored or discriminated against in policy, resource allocation, or public discourse.
Effective law enforcement: There must be zero tolerance for religious violence, hate speech, and discrimination. Perpetrators must be swiftly apprehended and prosecuted, regardless of their religious affiliation, to ensure justice and deter future offenses.
Judicial independence: The judiciary must remain independent and impartial, ensuring fair and consistent interpretation of religious freedom cases, balancing competing rights, and providing redress for violations.
Promoting inclusive policies: Government policies, especially in education, employment, and social services, must be inclusive and equitable, ensuring that all religious groups have equal opportunities and are not marginalized.
Strengthening human rights commissions: National and state human rights commissions should be adequately funded and empowered to investigate religious freedom violations, mediate disputes, and provide recommendations for redress and policy reform.

B. Role of Religious Leaders and Organizations

Religious leaders wield immense influence and have a critical role to play in fostering religious harmony.

Interfaith dialogue and cooperation: Promoting genuine and sustained dialogue among leaders of different faiths is paramount. This can break down barriers, build trust, and facilitate collective action on issues of common concern.
Preaching peace and tolerance: Religious leaders must actively use their pulpits and platforms to preach messages of peace, love, tolerance, and respect for all humanity, unequivocally condemning hate speech, bigotry, and violence in the name of religion.
Education and sensitization: Religious institutions should educate their followers about the importance of religious freedom for all, emphasizing shared values of human dignity and mutual respect found in most faiths.
Advocacy for justice and human rights: Religious organizations can advocate for the rights of all citizens, including those of other faiths, and hold the government accountable for protecting fundamental freedoms.

C. Role of Civil Society and Individuals

Civil society organizations and individuals are vital in monitoring, advocating for, and building a more tolerant society.

Human rights advocacy groups: These groups play a crucial role in documenting religious freedom violations, providing legal aid to victims, and advocating for policy changes.
Peacebuilding initiatives: Grassroots organizations working on interfaith peacebuilding, conflict resolution, and reconciliation are essential for healing divides and fostering coexistence at the community level.
Promoting media literacy: Countering misinformation and hate propaganda, especially on social media, requires promoting media literacy and critical thinking skills among citizens.
Individual responsibility: Ultimately, the preservation of religious freedom depends on individual citizens. This means practicing tolerance, respecting differing beliefs, engaging in constructive dialogue, and challenging discriminatory attitudes or actions within one’s own community.

D. Education and Curriculum Reform

Education is a powerful tool for shaping attitudes and promoting understanding.

Integrating religious tolerance and human rights education: School curricula should incorporate lessons on religious diversity, tolerance, and fundamental human rights, including religious freedom. This can help instill values of respect and understanding from an early age.
Promoting critical thinking: Encouraging critical thinking about religious texts, traditions, and contemporary issues can help individuals develop nuanced perspectives and resist extremist ideologies.

V. Conclusion

The right to freedom of religion and worship in Nigeria is far more than a legal formality; it is an indispensable pillar upon which the nation’s unity, stability, and progress depend. It empowers individuals to seek truth, express their deepest convictions, and live authentically according to their conscience. When this right is protected, it fosters a society where diverse beliefs can coexist, contribute, and enrich the national fabric.

However, as we have explored, this fundamental right faces persistent and formidable challenges, ranging from historical grievances and ethno-religious conflicts to the brutal violence perpetrated by extremist groups and, at times, the unintended consequences of state actions. The ongoing debates surrounding the application of Sharia law, instances of religious discrimination, and the tragic consequences of intolerance underscore the fragility of this freedom.

Yet, there is hope. The strength of Nigeria’s constitutional provisions, coupled with the resilience of its civil society, the growing engagement of religious leaders in interfaith dialogue, and the increasing awareness among citizens, offers a promising path forward. Upholding religious freedom demands unwavering commitment from all stakeholders: a government that is truly neutral and just, religious leaders who preach peace and understanding, and citizens who champion tolerance and mutual respect.

The journey towards a truly harmonious multi-religious society in Nigeria is ongoing. It requires continuous effort, vigilance, and a shared understanding that the freedom to worship is inextricably linked to the freedom to live, to thrive, and to build a nation where every individual, regardless of their faith, can realize their full potential. Only by strengthening these unassailable pillars can Nigeria truly harness the power of its diversity for collective prosperity and enduring peace.

Table of Contents