How to File a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit in Nigeria: A Comprehensive Guide

Nigeria’s legal landscape, like that of many democratic nations, is anchored on the principle of fundamental human rights. These rights, enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) and other international instruments, serve as a bulwark against oppression and arbitrary actions by the state and its agents. When these sacrosanct rights are violated or threatened, the law provides a clear pathway for citizens to seek redress: the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit.

This comprehensive guide aims to demystify the process of filing a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit in Nigeria, offering a detailed, step-by-step approach. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and provide a holistic overview, it is crucial to remember that legal matters are complex and highly fact-dependent. This article should not be considered a substitute for professional legal advice. Always consult with a qualified Nigerian lawyer for personalized guidance regarding your specific situation.

Understanding Fundamental Human Rights in Nigeria

At the core of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit is the concept of fundamental human rights. These are inherent rights that every individual possesses by virtue of being human, and they are protected by law. In Nigeria, the primary source of these rights is Chapter IV of the 1999 Constitution. Some of these constitutionally guaranteed rights include:

Right to Life (Section 33): No one shall be deprived intentionally of his life, save in the execution of the sentence of a court in respect of a criminal offence of which he has been found guilty in Nigeria.
Right to Dignity of Human Person (Section 34): Every individual is entitled to respect for the dignity of his person, and no person shall be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, or slavery or servitude.
Right to Personal Liberty (Section 35): Every person shall be entitled to his personal liberty and no person shall be deprived of such liberty save in accordance with a procedure permitted by law.
Right to Fair Hearing (Section 36): In the determination of his civil rights and obligations, including any question or determination by or against any government or authority, a person shall be entitled to a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court or other tribunal established by law.
Right to Private and Family Life (Section 37): The privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, telephone conversations, and telegraphic communications is guaranteed and protected.
Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion (Section 38): Every person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, including freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in public or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice, and observance.
Right to Freedom of Expression and the Press (Section 39): Every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference.
Right to Peaceful Assembly and Association (Section 40): Every person shall be entitled to assemble freely and associate with other persons, and in particular, he may form or belong to any political party, trade union, or any other association for the protection of his interests.
Right to Freedom of Movement (Section 41): Every citizen of Nigeria is entitled to move freely throughout Nigeria and to reside in any part thereof, and no citizen of Nigeria shall be expelled from Nigeria or refused entry thereto or exit therefrom.
Right to Freedom from Discrimination (Section 42): No citizen of Nigeria shall be subjected to any disability or deprivation merely by reason of the circumstances of his birth, or the place of origin, sex, religion, or political opinion.
Right to Acquire and Own Immovable Property (Section 43): Every citizen of Nigeria shall have the right to acquire and own immovable property anywhere in Nigeria.

Beyond the Nigerian Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act also forms a significant part of the legal framework for human rights in Nigeria. This Act incorporates the provisions of the African Charter, which covers similar civil and political rights, and to a limited extent, economic, social, and cultural rights.

It is vital to understand that not every grievance or legal dispute constitutes a fundamental human rights violation. For an action to be justiciable under fundamental rights enforcement procedures, the primary or principal claim must directly relate to the infringement, or threatened infringement, of a fundamental right as enshrined in Chapter IV of the Constitution or the African Charter. General contractual disputes, land matters, or employment issues, for instance, generally fall under civil law and are typically not enforceable through a fundamental rights suit unless a clear fundamental right violation is demonstrably intertwined with the case.

The Legal Framework: Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009

The procedure for enforcing these rights is specifically laid out in the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009 (FREP Rules). These rules, enacted by the Chief Justice of Nigeria pursuant to Section 46(3) of the Constitution, were designed to simplify and expedite the process of human rights litigation, addressing previous technical hurdles and ensuring greater access to justice.

Key innovations introduced by the FREP Rules 2009 include:

Abolition of Locus Standi as a Barrier: Previously, a person needed to show a direct personal interest in the matter to have locus standi (legal standing) to sue. The FREP Rules have broadened this, allowing public interest litigation. This means that even if your rights are not directly violated, you may be able to bring a suit on behalf of another person, a group, or in the public interest, especially where vulnerable individuals are concerned. This is a significant departure from the previous rules.
Emphasis on Substantial Justice: The Rules prioritize substantial justice over technicalities, encouraging courts to interpret and apply human rights provisions expansively to advance, rather than restrict, the rights and freedoms of applicants.
Expedited Hearing: Fundamental rights cases are to be given priority and treated as urgent matters, especially where the liberty of an applicant is at stake.
Application of International Instruments: The Rules explicitly mandate that courts respect and apply municipal, regional, and international bills of rights cited to them, fostering a more cosmopolitan approach to human rights adjudication.

Who Can File a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit?

The FREP Rules 2009 significantly expanded the categories of individuals and entities who can initiate a fundamental rights enforcement suit. This progressive stance aims to ensure that human rights abuses do not go unchallenged. Generally, the following can file a suit:

Any Person Whose Fundamental Right Has Been, Is Being, or Is Likely to Be Infringed: This is the most direct category. If you are the victim of a fundamental rights violation, you can initiate the suit.
Anyone Acting in His/Her Own Interest: This covers direct victims.
Anyone Acting on Behalf of Another Person: This is a crucial expansion. If you know someone whose rights are being violated but they are unable to seek redress themselves (e.g., due to detention, illiteracy, vulnerability, or fear), you can act on their behalf.
Anyone Acting as a Member of, or in the Interest of, a Group or Class of Persons: This allows for class actions or representative suits where a group of people are affected by a similar fundamental rights violation.
Anyone Acting in the Public Interest: This enables human rights organizations, civil society groups, and even concerned citizens to initiate actions to uphold fundamental rights for the broader public good, even if no specific individual is named as a direct victim.

This broad interpretation of locus standi is a cornerstone of the FREP Rules 2009, making it easier for human rights violations to be challenged in court.

When to File: Timing and Urgency

It is advisable to initiate a fundamental rights enforcement suit as soon as possible after the violation or the likelihood of a violation occurs. While the FREP Rules generally state that an application cannot be affected by any limitation statute (like the Public Officers Protection Act), prompt action is crucial for several reasons:

Preservation of Evidence: Delay can lead to the loss of crucial evidence, the disappearance of witnesses, or the fading of memories, all of which can weaken your case.
Urgency of Relief: Many fundamental rights cases, particularly those involving personal liberty (e.g., unlawful detention), require urgent judicial intervention. Courts are mandated to treat such cases as emergencies.
Preventing Further Harm: Timely intervention can prevent further infringement of rights or mitigate the harm already suffered.

While there isn’t a strict statutory limitation period for fundamental rights cases in the same way as other civil actions, undue delay without reasonable explanation could still be viewed unfavorably by the court.

Jurisdiction: Which Court to Approach?

In Nigeria, the courts primarily vested with jurisdiction to hear and determine Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suits are:

The Federal High Court: This court has jurisdiction where the alleged infringement arises from matters over which the Federal High Court has exclusive original jurisdiction as stipulated in Section 251 of the 1999 Constitution (e.g., revenue of the Federal Government, admiralty matters, banking, etc.) or any other Act of the National Assembly. It also has concurrent jurisdiction with the State High Court in many fundamental rights matters.
The High Court of a State: This court has broad original jurisdiction to hear and determine fundamental rights applications in the state where the infringement occurred or is likely to occur.
The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT): Similar to a State High Court, it exercises jurisdiction over fundamental rights matters within the FCT.
The National Industrial Court (NIC): In specific instances, particularly where the fundamental rights violation arises directly from employment and labour-related matters, the NIC may have jurisdiction as provided under Section 254C (1) of the 1999 Constitution (as altered).

Crucially, the rule is that you must file the application in the High Court of the State or Federal High Court within or covering the state where the alleged violation occurred. If a breach occurs partly in one state and partly in another, either of the two states may have jurisdiction.

It is important to determine the appropriate court to avoid your suit being struck out for lack of jurisdiction, which can be a significant setback. A lawyer can help you identify the correct court based on the facts of your case.

Step-by-Step Process for Filing a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit

The process of filing a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit generally involves the following steps:

Step 1: Consultation with a Legal Practitioner

This is the most critical first step. Due to the complexities of legal drafting, evidence gathering, and court procedures, attempting to file a fundamental rights suit without legal representation is highly discouraged. A lawyer will:

Assess your case: Determine if a fundamental human right has indeed been violated and if it is justiciable under the FREP Rules.
Identify the proper parties: Determine who the Applicant(s) and Respondent(s) should be. This is crucial as suing the wrong party can lead to the dismissal of your case. Generally, fundamental rights suits are brought against the government or its agencies/agents, as fundamental rights are primarily designed to protect citizens from state excesses. While there are arguments for extending it to private entities in certain contexts (especially concerning rights like privacy), the traditional view limits enforcement against state actors.
Advise on jurisdiction: Determine the appropriate court to file the suit.
Gather evidence: Help you collate all necessary documents, witness statements, and other forms of evidence to support your claim.
Draft the necessary court processes: Prepare the originating motion, affidavit, and written address.

Step 2: Drafting the Originating Motion

Unlike regular civil suits which often commence with a writ of summons or originating summons, a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit is typically commenced by an Originating Motion. This is a special mode of commencement designed for speed and efficiency in fundamental rights matters. The Originating Motion will contain:

The Name and Description of the Applicant(s): Full names and details of the person(s) seeking redress.
The Relief(s) Sought: This is a clear statement of what you are asking the court to grant. Common reliefs include:
- A declaration that the actions of the Respondent constitute a violation of a specific fundamental right.
- An order of injunction restraining the Respondent from further violating the Applicant’s rights.
- An order for damages (monetary compensation) for the violation suffered.
- An order for a public apology.
- Prerogative orders like:
  - Habeas Corpus: An order compelling a person holding another in detention to produce the detained person in court and show a lawful reason for the detention.
  - Mandamus: An order compelling a public official or body to perform a public duty which they are legally obligated to perform.
  - Prohibition: An order preventing a lower court or public body from exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to natural justice.
  - Certiorari: An order quashing a decision of a lower court or public body that was made in excess of jurisdiction, or in violation of natural justice, or where there is an error of law on the face of the record.
The Grounds Upon Which the Reliefs are Sought: This section outlines the legal and factual basis for your claim, linking the alleged actions of the Respondent to the specific fundamental rights violated. It will refer to the relevant sections of the Constitution and the FREP Rules.

Step 3: Supporting Affidavit

The Originating Motion must be supported by an Affidavit Setting Out the Facts upon which the application is made. An affidavit is a sworn statement of facts, made under oath or affirmation. It is the primary way of presenting the evidence in a fundamental rights suit. The affidavit should:

Be deposed to by the Applicant or someone with personal knowledge of the facts: The deponent is the person making the affidavit.
State facts clearly and concisely: Avoid legal arguments or opinions in the affidavit.
Annex relevant exhibits: Attach supporting documents such as police reports, medical reports, letters, photographs, videos, or any other documentary evidence that substantiates your claims. These exhibits are usually marked numerically (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.).

Step 4: Applicant’s Written Address

Alongside the Originating Motion and supporting affidavit, the Applicant must file a Written Address. This is a legal argument prepared by your lawyer, setting out the legal principles and precedents that support your case. The written address will:

Contain a brief argument in support of the grounds: Explain how the facts presented in the affidavit amount to a violation of your fundamental rights and cite relevant laws.
Refer to legal authorities: Cite relevant sections of the Constitution, the FREP Rules, and previous court judgments (case law) that support your position.
Articulate the reliefs sought: Reiterate the specific orders and declarations you are asking the court to make.

Step 5: Filing the Processes at the Court Registry

Once all the documents (Originating Motion, Supporting Affidavit, and Written Address) are prepared, they are filed at the registry of the appropriate High Court. You will be required to pay the prescribed filing fees. Ensure you get duly endorsed copies for your records and for service on the Respondent(s).

Step 6: Service of Court Processes on the Respondent(s)

After filing, the court processes must be served on the Respondent(s). This is a formal notification that a suit has been filed against them and that they are required to respond. The FREP Rules mandate that the Respondent(s) be served with:

The Originating Motion.
The Supporting Affidavit (with all attached exhibits).
The Applicant’s Written Address.

The service must be personal, meaning the documents are delivered directly to the Respondent or their authorized representative. In some cases, where personal service is not practicable, the court may allow for substituted service (e.g., by pasting the documents at their last known address or publishing in a newspaper). The law typically gives the Respondent a specific timeframe (usually 5 days under the FREP Rules) to respond.

Step 7: Respondent’s Counter-Affidavit and Written Address

Upon being served, the Respondent, if they intend to oppose the application, will file a Counter-Affidavit and a Respondent’s Written Address within the stipulated timeframe.

Counter-Affidavit: This is their sworn statement of facts, responding to the Applicant’s claims and presenting their own version of events. They may also attach their own exhibits.
Respondent’s Written Address: This will contain their legal arguments, challenging the Applicant’s claims and citing legal authorities to support their defense.

Step 8: Applicant’s Reply on Points of Law (Optional)

If the Respondent files a counter-affidavit and written address, the Applicant has the right to file a Reply on Points of Law within a specified timeframe (usually 5 days). This reply is typically limited to responding to new legal issues or arguments raised by the Respondent, and it may be accompanied by a further affidavit if new facts arise in response to the counter-affidavit.

Step 9: Hearing and Adoption of Written Addresses

The court will fix a date for the hearing of the application, usually within 7 days of filing the application, emphasizing the urgency of fundamental rights cases. On the hearing date:

Parties or their counsel will appear in court.
Counsel will “adopt” their written addresses: This involves formally presenting the written arguments to the court. Sometimes, the court may allow for brief oral elaboration or clarification.
The court will typically rely on the affidavit evidence: Unlike regular trials that involve extensive oral testimony and cross-examination, fundamental rights cases under the FREP Rules are primarily determined on the basis of the affidavits and written addresses. Oral evidence is usually taken only in exceptional circumstances where there are significant conflicts in the affidavit evidence that cannot be resolved without oral testimony.

Step 10: Judgment

After hearing the parties and considering all the filed processes, the court will deliver its judgment. The judgment will determine whether a fundamental right has been violated and, if so, grant the appropriate reliefs as sought by the Applicant or as deemed fit by the court.

Essential Documents for a Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit

To ensure a smooth and successful application, the following documents are typically essential:

Originating Motion: The formal application initiating the suit.
Supporting Affidavit: Sworn statement of facts detailing the violation.
Exhibits: All documentary and visual evidence supporting the affidavit (e.g., medical reports, police reports, photographs, videos, correspondence, contracts, arrest warrants, detention orders, press clippings, etc.).
Applicant’s Written Address: Legal arguments supporting the application.
Power of Attorney/Authority (if acting on behalf of another): If you are filing on behalf of someone else, you may need to show you have the authority to do so, though the FREP Rules generally relax locus standi.
Legal Practitioner’s NBA Stamp and Seal: All court processes filed by a legal practitioner in Nigeria must bear their NBA stamp and seal.
Proof of Payment of Filing Fees: Receipts for court fees.

Common Challenges and Considerations

While the FREP Rules 2009 have streamlined the process, certain challenges and considerations remain:

Proof of Violation: The burden of proof lies with the Applicant to demonstrate that a fundamental right has been violated, is being violated, or is likely to be violated. This requires concrete evidence.
Identification of Proper Parties: Incorrectly naming the Respondent (e.g., suing a private individual or company for a fundamental right when the violation is not attributable to state action) can lead to the dismissal of the suit.
Distinguishing Fundamental Rights from Other Civil Wrongs: As mentioned earlier, not every wrong is a fundamental rights violation. Courts will strike out suits that are merely civil disputes disguised as fundamental rights enforcement actions. The primary claim must be a fundamental rights matter.
Abuse of Process: Frivolous or vexatious applications can be struck out or dismissed by the court.
Cost of Litigation: While legal aid services exist, litigation can still be expensive, especially if the case is complex or goes through appeals.
Enforcement of Judgments: Obtaining a favorable judgment is one thing; enforcing it, particularly against government agencies, can sometimes pose a challenge.
Corruption and Delay: Despite provisions for expedited hearings, systemic issues of judicial delay and corruption can still affect the pace of litigation.
Public Officers Protection Act: While the FREP Rules generally state that a fundamental rights action is not subject to limitation statutes like the Public Officers Protection Act (which typically provides a three-month limitation period for actions against public officers), it’s a point that can sometimes be argued by respondents. However, established case law strongly favors the non-application of such limitation periods in fundamental rights cases.

Remedies for Fundamental Rights Violations

If the court finds that a fundamental right has been violated, it can grant a range of remedies, including:

Declarations: A formal statement by the court affirming that a particular right has been violated.
Injunctions: Orders prohibiting the Respondent from performing certain actions (e.g., further harassment, unlawful detention, demolition of property).
Damages: Monetary compensation awarded to the Applicant for the loss, injury, or suffering caused by the violation. The amount of damages depends on the severity of the violation, the extent of loss, and the court’s discretion.
Orders for Release/Bail: In cases of unlawful detention, the court can order the immediate release of the Applicant or grant them bail.
Orders for Production of Person (Habeas Corpus): Compelling the production of a detained person in court.
Orders for Apology: Directing the offending party to issue a public apology.
Orders for Public Redress: Any other order the court deems appropriate to address the violation and prevent future occurrences.

The aim of these remedies is to restore the Applicant to the position they were in before the violation occurred, or to provide adequate compensation for the harm suffered.

Seeking Legal Aid

For indigent citizens who cannot afford legal representation, various avenues for legal aid exist in Nigeria:

Legal Aid Council of Nigeria (LACON): Established by the Legal Aid Act, LACON provides free legal services to eligible indigent Nigerians, particularly in criminal matters, but increasingly in civil and human rights cases. Eligibility is usually based on income (e.g., not exceeding the national minimum wage).
Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Pro Bono Scheme: The NBA encourages its members to provide free legal services to the less privileged.
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Many human rights organizations in Nigeria offer pro bono legal services, advice, and support to victims of human rights abuses. Examples include the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), Constitutional Rights Project (CRP), Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP), and Human Rights Law Service (HURILAWS).
University Law Clinics: Many university law faculties in Nigeria operate law clinics where law students, supervised by experienced lawyers, provide free legal advice and assistance to the public.

These resources are vital in ensuring that access to justice is not limited by financial constraints, especially in fundamental rights matters.

Conclusion

The Fundamental Rights Enforcement Suit stands as a powerful legal instrument in Nigeria, designed to safeguard the constitutional and human rights of every individual. While the FREP Rules 2009 have simplified the procedure and broadened access to justice, successfully navigating the complexities of legal proceedings still requires careful planning, meticulous evidence gathering, and sound legal expertise.

Anyone who believes their fundamental rights have been violated, or are at risk of being violated, should not hesitate to seek the advice of a qualified legal practitioner. A lawyer can assess the specifics of your case, guide you through each stage of the process, and advocate effectively on your behalf to ensure that justice is served and that your fundamental rights are protected and enforced. The Nigerian legal system, through the robust framework of fundamental rights enforcement, strives to be a shield for the vulnerable and a deterrent against arbitrary power, ensuring that the dignity and liberty of every Nigerian are upheld.

Table of Contents