The Right to Marry and Found a Family: Constitutional Dimensions

The right to marry and to found a family stands as a cornerstone of human dignity and societal structure. Far from being a mere social convention, it is increasingly recognized as a fundamental human right, deeply embedded within constitutional frameworks across the globe and enshrined in international human rights instruments. This extensive exploration will delve into the multifaceted constitutional dimensions of this essential right, tracing its historical evolution, examining its scope and limitations, analyzing landmark judicial pronouncements, considering its international human rights context, and addressing contemporary challenges and future trajectories, with a particular focus on the Nigerian legal landscape.

I. Introduction: The Enduring Significance of Marriage and Family

Marriage, as an institution, and the family, as its natural outgrowth, have been central to human societies throughout history. They serve as primary units of socialization, emotional support, economic cooperation, and the transmission of cultural values. Beyond their sociological importance, the ability of individuals to freely choose a partner, enter into a marital union, and establish a family is a deeply personal and often profound expression of autonomy and self-determination.

Recognizing this profound significance, modern constitutional democracies and international legal frameworks have progressively afforded legal protection to the right to marry and to found a family. This protection is not absolute but rather a carefully balanced right, subject to reasonable limitations and evolving interpretations that reflect societal changes and a deeper understanding of equality and human dignity.

II. Historical Evolution of the Right to Marry in Constitutional Law

The explicit recognition of the “right to marry” in constitutional texts is a relatively recent phenomenon, but the underlying principles of personal liberty and the sanctity of private relationships have much deeper roots.

A. Early Understandings and Implied Protections

In early constitutional thought, particularly in common law systems, the right to marry was often not expressly enumerated but was considered an inherent aspect of “liberty” or “due process.” Courts would infer protection for marital and family relationships as part of a broader right to privacy and personal autonomy. This implied protection was largely understood within the traditional framework of heterosexual marriage.

B. The Mid-20th Century: Challenging Discriminatory Barriers

The mid-20th century witnessed significant challenges to discriminatory marriage laws, particularly in the United States. Landmark cases began to dismantle state-sanctioned restrictions that infringed upon the freedom to marry.

Racial Restrictions: The most prominent example is Loving v. Virginia (1967) in the United States, where the Supreme Court unanimously struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The Court held that marriage is “one of the ‘basic civil rights of man,’ fundamental to our very existence and survival” and that denying this freedom on racial grounds violated both the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. This case was pivotal in establishing the fundamental nature of the right to marry and its close connection to principles of equality.
Other Restrictions: Challenges also arose concerning other restrictions, such as those related to individuals with certain disabilities, prisoners, or those with outstanding child support obligations. Courts generally applied a strict scrutiny standard to such restrictions, requiring a compelling state interest and narrowly tailored means.

C. The Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries: Expanding the Definition of Marriage

The latter part of the 20th century and the early 21st century have been marked by a profound re-evaluation and expansion of who can exercise the right to marry, particularly concerning same-sex couples.

Privacy and Autonomy Arguments: Early legal arguments for same-sex marriage often drew upon the right to privacy and personal autonomy recognized in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) (right to contraception) and Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) (right to contraception for unmarried individuals). These cases established a zone of privacy around intimate decisions, including those related to procreation and family formation.
Equal Protection Arguments: Increasingly, arguments shifted to the Equal Protection Clause, contending that denying same-sex couples the right to marry constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Landmark Decisions on Same-Sex Marriage:
- United States (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015): This seminal Supreme Court decision held that the right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court affirmed that marriage is a fundamental right and that states cannot deny this right to same-sex couples.
- Other Jurisdictions: Many other countries, through judicial decisions or legislative action, have also legalized same-sex marriage, reflecting a global trend towards greater inclusion and equality in the exercise of this fundamental right.

This historical trajectory demonstrates a continuous broadening of the understanding of the right to marry, moving from an unstated, traditionally understood heterosexual right to an explicitly recognized and inclusively applied fundamental human right.

III. Scope and Dimensions of the Right to Marry and Found a Family

The constitutional right to marry and found a family is not merely a right to a wedding ceremony. It encompasses a range of associated rights and protections.

A. The Right to Marry

Freedom to Marry: This is the core aspect, meaning individuals of marriageable age have the liberty to choose to marry. It implies freedom from arbitrary state interference or prohibitions based on factors like race, religion, nationality, or sexual orientation.
Freedom Not to Marry: Equally important is the freedom not to marry. No individual can be compelled into marriage, underscoring the principle of free and full consent. This is particularly relevant in combating practices like forced marriage and child marriage.
Choice of Spouse: The right extends to the freedom to choose one’s spouse without undue state interference, subject to legitimate, non-discriminatory regulations (e.g., prohibitions on incestuous marriages).
Equal Rights in Marriage: Constitutional protection often extends to ensuring equal rights for spouses during the marriage and at its dissolution, covering aspects like property rights, parental rights, and protection against domestic abuse.

B. The Right to Found a Family

This dimension extends beyond the act of marriage itself to the broader concept of establishing and nurturing a family.

Procreation and Childbearing: This includes the right to procreate and raise children. It is closely linked to reproductive autonomy, including decisions about contraception and, controversially, abortion. While the right to procreate is recognized, it is not an absolute right to have children at any cost or through any means, and states may regulate reproductive technologies or adoption.
Parenting and Child Rearing: The right to found a family also encompasses the right to parent one’s children, make decisions about their upbringing, education, and religious instruction. State intervention in these matters is typically limited to cases of abuse, neglect, or compelling state interests.
Family Unity and Integrity: This aspect protects the family unit from unwarranted state intrusion and facilitates family cohesion. It includes, for instance, the right to live together as a family, protection against arbitrary separation, and considerations for family reunification in immigration contexts.
Recognition of Diverse Family Forms: While traditionally linked to marriage, the concept of “founding a family” has evolved to recognize and protect various family structures beyond the conventional married, heterosexual couple with biological children. This includes single-parent families, blended families, adoptive families, and, increasingly, families formed by same-sex couples, recognizing that the essence of “family” lies in deep, enduring personal relationships and shared responsibilities.

C. The Interplay with Other Fundamental Rights

The right to marry and found a family does not exist in isolation. It is deeply interconnected with other fundamental constitutional rights:

Right to Dignity: Denying individuals the right to marry or found a family can be seen as an affront to their inherent human dignity, implying they are lesser or unworthy.
Right to Equality and Non-discrimination: Prohibitions based on race, religion, nationality, or sexual orientation directly violate the principle of equality. Constitutional provisions guaranteeing non-discrimination are crucial in safeguarding this right.
Right to Privacy: Decisions about marriage, procreation, and family life are inherently private matters, protected from unwarranted governmental intrusion.
Freedom of Association: The right to marry can be viewed as a specific form of the freedom of association, allowing individuals to form intimate bonds and social units.

IV. Constitutional Limitations and State Regulation

While fundamental, the right to marry and found a family is not absolute and can be subject to reasonable state regulation. These limitations are generally permissible if they serve a legitimate state interest and are narrowly tailored.

A. Legitimate State Interests

States have a legitimate interest in regulating marriage for various reasons, including:

Public Health and Safety: This can include requirements for age, mental capacity, and prohibitions on polygamy or incestuous marriages to prevent harm to individuals or society.
Protecting Vulnerable Individuals: Laws against child marriage and forced marriage are critical to protecting minors and ensuring free consent.
Maintaining Order and Record-Keeping: Requiring licenses, registration, and other procedural formalities ensures legal certainty and facilitates record-keeping for purposes like inheritance and social benefits.
Ensuring Free Consent: Laws requiring free and full consent of both parties are paramount to prevent exploitation and uphold individual autonomy.

B. Scrutiny of Limitations

When state regulations infringe upon the fundamental right to marry, courts typically apply a heightened level of scrutiny. This means the state must demonstrate:

Compelling State Interest: The government’s purpose for the restriction must be exceedingly important.
Narrow Tailoring: The means chosen by the government must be precisely designed to achieve that compelling interest and should not be overly broad or unduly burdensome on the right.

For example, a law prohibiting marriage between close relatives (incest) is generally upheld as serving a compelling state interest in public health and preventing genetic defects. However, a law prohibiting marriage based on a prior conviction for a minor offense would likely be struck down as not narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest.

V. International Human Rights Framework

The constitutional protection of the right to marry and found a family is reinforced and informed by international human rights law, which serves as a significant interpretive guide for domestic courts and legislatures.

A. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

Article 16 of the UDHR, adopted in 1948, explicitly states:

“Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolu¹tion.”
“Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.”
“The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.”

This article is foundational, establishing the universal nature of the right and emphasizing key principles like non-discrimination, free consent, and state protection of the family.

B. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

Article 23 of the ICCPR largely reiterates and expands upon Article 16 of the UDHR. It affirms the right to marry and to found a family for men and women of marriageable age, highlighting the family as the “natural and fundamental group unit of society” deserving of state protection. While the ICCPR’s wording “men and women” was historically interpreted by some as limiting marriage to heterosexual unions, contemporary human rights bodies increasingly interpret these provisions in light of evolving understandings of equality and non-discrimination to include same-sex relationships.

C. Other Relevant International Instruments

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): This convention further elaborates on the equal rights of men and women in marriage and family matters, particularly focusing on eliminating discrimination against women.
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC): The CRC emphasizes the importance of the family for the development and well-being of children and protects children’s rights within the family context.
Regional Human Rights Instruments: Regional instruments, such as the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 12), the American Convention on Human Rights, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, also contain provisions protecting the right to marry and family life, often with their own unique interpretive jurisprudence.

The international human rights framework provides a normative benchmark against which national laws and practices are assessed, promoting a consistent global understanding of the fundamental nature of these rights.

VI. The Right to Marry and Found a Family in Nigeria: Constitutional and Legal Landscape

Nigeria, like many other nations, grapples with the complexities of protecting the right to marry and found a family within its diverse legal and cultural landscape. The Nigerian legal system recognizes three main types of marriage: statutory (monogamous), customary (potentially polygamous), and Islamic (potentially polygamous).

A. Constitutional Basis

While the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) does not explicitly list “the right to marry” as a fundamental human right in Chapter IV, these rights are largely protected indirectly through other provisions:

Right to Personal Liberty (Section 35): The freedom to choose a spouse and enter into a marital union is an inherent aspect of personal liberty. Arbitrary restrictions on this freedom could be challenged under this provision.
Right to Private and Family Life (Section 37): This section guarantees the right to private and family life, which implicitly protects the integrity of the family unit and the freedom to establish a family. State interference with family life without due process or a legitimate basis would be challenged under this provision.
Right to Freedom from Discrimination (Section 42): This is a crucial provision that prohibits discrimination based on various grounds, including ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion, or political opinion. While not explicitly mentioning marital status or sexual orientation, arguments for the right to marry free from discrimination could be anchored here, particularly as the jurisprudence around Section 42 evolves.
Right to Dignity of Human Person (Section 34): Denying individuals the right to marry or form a family on discriminatory grounds could be seen as an affront to their human dignity.

It is important to note that the interpretation of these rights within the Nigerian context often takes into account the prevailing socio-cultural norms and the recognition of diverse marriage systems.

B. Statutory, Customary, and Islamic Law Frameworks

Statutory Marriage (Marriage Act and Matrimonial Causes Act): This is a monogamous union governed by federal legislation. It provides a clear legal framework for marriage, divorce, and associated rights (e.g., spousal maintenance, child custody, inheritance). It emphasizes free consent and minimum age requirements.
Customary Marriage: Governed by the customary laws of various ethnic groups, these marriages are diverse and often permit polygyny. While consent is generally required, traditional practices can sometimes place pressure on individuals. Issues like bride price and traditional dispute resolution mechanisms are prevalent. The constitution generally respects customary law, provided it does not contravene fundamental rights.
Islamic Marriage: Governed by Islamic personal law (Sharia), primarily applied in Northern states, these marriages also permit polygyny (up to four wives). Like customary marriages, they have specific requirements for validity and processes for divorce and family matters.

C. Challenges and Specific Issues in Nigeria

Child Marriage: Despite national and international condemnation, child marriage remains a significant challenge, particularly in some customary and religious contexts. This directly violates the principle of free and full consent and the right to education and health for young girls. Advocacy for stricter enforcement of the Child Rights Act, which sets the minimum age of marriage at 18, is ongoing.
Forced Marriage: Similar to child marriage, forced marriage, where one or both parties do not genuinely consent, is a violation of human rights and is legally prohibited.
Discrimination and Inequality: While the Constitution prohibits discrimination, practical inequalities persist, particularly for women, in matters of inheritance, property rights, and divorce under customary and Islamic law. Reform efforts aim to ensure greater gender equality within these systems.
Recognition of Non-Traditional Unions: The Nigerian legal system, being largely conservative, does not currently recognize same-sex marriage or other non-traditional partnerships. The Same-Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act of 2014 criminalizes same-sex relationships and unions, directly conflicting with evolving international human rights standards and the jurisprudence of other nations on the right to marry and non-discrimination. This represents a significant blind spot in the constitutional protection of the right to marry for a segment of the population.
Challenges in Enforcement: Even where laws exist to protect rights within marriage and family, issues of enforcement, access to justice, and societal attitudes can hinder their effectiveness.

VII. Contemporary Challenges and Evolving Interpretations

The constitutional dimensions of the right to marry and found a family continue to evolve in response to societal changes and new legal questions.

A. Reproductive Rights and Technologies

The “right to found a family” increasingly encompasses questions related to reproductive autonomy and access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART). This includes debates around:

Access to Contraception and Abortion: While distinct from marriage, these rights are linked to the ability to control one’s body and make choices about family size and timing.
In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Surrogacy: Legal and ethical questions arise regarding access to these technologies, parental rights, and the legal status of children born through these methods. Constitutional protection may extend to preventing arbitrary denial of access to such technologies.

B. Polygamy and Plural Unions

In many jurisdictions, constitutional frameworks that protect the right to marry implicitly or explicitly limit it to monogamous unions. However, in countries like Nigeria where customary and religious laws permit polygamy, there is a complex interplay between traditional practices and modern constitutional principles, particularly regarding equality and the rights of women. Debates often center on whether and how polygamous unions can be reconciled with modern human rights standards, especially those guaranteeing equal rights in marriage and at its dissolution.

C. Marriage for Prisoners and Individuals with Disabilities

The extent to which prisoners or individuals with certain disabilities can exercise the right to marry and found a family has been a subject of litigation. While general restrictions might be permissible (e.g., security concerns for prisoners), outright bans are often viewed as discriminatory and unconstitutional if not narrowly tailored to a compelling state interest.

D. Transgender Rights and Marriage

The recognition of transgender individuals’ acquired gender for the purpose of marriage has also emerged as a significant constitutional issue. Many jurisdictions now allow transgender individuals to marry in their affirmed gender, consistent with the evolving understanding of equality and identity.

VIII. Conclusion: A Dynamic and Fundamental Right

The right to marry and found a family is a dynamic and fundamental human right, deeply rooted in principles of personal liberty, autonomy, dignity, and equality. Its constitutional dimensions have evolved significantly, moving from an unstated, traditionally understood heterosexual privilege to an explicitly recognized and inclusively applied right that encompasses diverse individuals and family forms.

From dismantling racial barriers to recognizing same-sex unions, and from protecting reproductive choices to safeguarding family unity, constitutional jurisprudence has consistently affirmed the vital importance of this right. However, challenges persist, particularly in contexts where traditional norms clash with evolving human rights standards, as seen in Nigeria’s complex legal landscape.

The ongoing discourse surrounding the right to marry and found a family highlights the continuous process of constitutional interpretation and adaptation in democratic societies. As societies continue to evolve, so too will the understanding and application of this essential right, ensuring that all individuals have the freedom and protection to form the intimate relationships and families that are so central to human flourishing. The pursuit of “zero blind spots” in its application means striving for a future where no individual is arbitrarily denied the profound joy and societal recognition that come with exercising the right to marry and found a family.

Table of Contents